THE ROAD TO THE 3-D STORY
(c/o Wikimedia Commons/T.C. Photochrom.)
THE RISK for any arts critic is to embrace the consensus of the presumed greatness of their art.
They’re almost forced to believe in it, surrounded as they are by the promotional noise of giant media conglomerates– including “Big Five” publishing– and other arms of an enormous status quo literary scene. That for all its enormity, whose many appendages carry the same premises and think the same way.
On some level the careers of the inhabitants of the established literary hive are dependent upon that belief in their art’s greatness. Their very number and the very size of the hive reinforces the belief. Which prevents them from looking outside the art, away from the current system.
The latest well-hyped release appears on their desk, and everyone is praising it. Can they fail to do likewise?
This limits their imaginations. They don’t search for those who don’t-play-the-game-the right-way. They don’t look for ways their art could be changed– or seek out those who are changing it. They fail to glance outside the tunnel– for instance, at other possible ways of writing the short story. At alternate modes of literary creation.
Many of them dismiss the idea.
Which reinforces cultural stagnation.
The mundane, the predictable, the dreary.
The authentic artist destroys the predictable. The cautious. The same.
It’s the only way to operate.
-Karl Wenclas, New Pop Lit News